DID ALL OF YOU VISITING AND BEING SUED KNOW?

THAT THE COMPLAINT YOU HOLD IN FRONT OF YOU PROBABLY HAS A MILLION REASONS TO GET DISMISSED IN A COURT OF LAW AND YOU PROBABLY DON'T EVEN KNOW IT.......

ALL COLLECTION AGENCIES AND JUNK DEBT BUYER ATTORNEYS WANT A DEFAULT JUDGMENT.. IT'S AN EASY WIN FOR THEM....  IF YOU BACK DOWN AND LET THEM GET A DEFAULT JUDGMENT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING IN A COURT OF LAW THAT IS LISTED ON YOUR COMPLAINT.. YOU JUST GAVE THEM AN EASY WIN....BUT WHEN YOU FIGHT BACK THEY HAVE TO PROVE EVERY SINGLE THING LISTED ON YOUR COMPLAINT AND THIS IS WHEN THEY WILL BEGIN TO LOSE....

NEARLY ALL JUNK DEBT BUYERS/COLLECTION AGENCIES DO NOT HAVE THE PROPER DOCUMENTS TO WIN IN A COURT OF LAW....... BUT THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT.....  THEY WANT YOU TO BE SCARED AND CALL THEM TO SETTLE OR NOT SHOW UP IN COURT  SO THAT THEY WIN EVERY SINGLE CENT PLUS COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES............

ONCE YOU START THE PROCESS OF ANSWERING YOUR SUMMONS THAT MEANS YOU ARE NOT BACKING DOWN AND YOU CHOOSE TO FIGHT THEM BACK.. IF DONE PROPERLY THEY WILL NOT WANT TO FIGHT YOU BACK AND MOST LIKELY DISMISS YOUR CASE........

I CHOSE TO FIGHT BACK AN ORIGINAL CREDITOR AND COLLECTION AGENCIES AND WON EVERY SINGLE CASE. ALL WERE DISMISSED. IT WAS QUITE EASY. . .  CLICK THE BANNER BELOW FOR HELP AND FURTHER INFORMATION....

 

 

po9_00061


I used 13 Affirmative Defenses when answering my Summons.


As you can see above I won this case and it was dismissed.


I used everything here Click Here for More Information
This case has been dismissed since March 11, 2009 and is proof it works.



Comments No Comments »

affirmative defense n. when a defendant files an answer, in addition to denying some or all of the allegations, he/she can state what are called “affirmative defenses.” These defenses can contain allegations, take the initiative against statements of facts contrary to those stated in the original complaint against them, and include various defenses based on legal principles. Many of these defenses fall into the “boilerplate” (stated in routine, non-specific language) category, but one or more of the defenses may help the defendant.



Samples of Affirmative Defenses used in a Credit Card Lawsuit:


1.     Plantiff’s Complaint is time-barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations on credit card debt in the state of State. 


 2.     Defendant claims Lack of Privity as Defendant has never entered into any contractual or debtor/creditor arrangements with Plantiff. 


 3.     Plaintiff’s Complaint violates the Statute of Frauds as the purported contract or agreement falls within a class of contracts or agreements that are required to be in writing.  The purported contract alleged in the Complaint was not in writing and not signed by Defendant or by some another person authorized by Defendant and who was to answer to the alleged debt, default, or miscarriage of the other person.


 4.     Plaintiff is not the real party in interest and has failed to name all necessary parties.


 5.     CLICK HERE FOR MORE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES



Comments 1 Comment »

All Posts on this Website are ©Copyright of http://www.howtoanswerasummons.com. No Posts can be copied and/or re-written without consent. This includes giving this website credit for someone re-creating their own Articles, ask for permission to use our information before Publishing. Legal Disclaimer-I am not a lawyer, I am not providing any legal advice nor am I claiming to be a legal or debt expert. This site provides information about the law designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.

Law & Legal Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Google Analytics integration offered by Wordpress Google Analytics Plugin